As computer operating systems get older, issues and crashes start to become more frequent and OCZ SSD Utility for Linux 227 downloads. These issues commonly occur due to a lack of regular PC maintenance. OCZ device malfunction and communication issues can arise when the Windows operating system becomes overloaded with invalid system references, outdated or missing drivers, as well as corrupted or deleted system element files.
Ocz Ssd Utility 2.0.2430 Windows 10 64 Bit
Windows 10 64 bit, Windows 10, Windows 8.1 64 bit, Over the past few years, NVMe drives have been gradually increasing their place in the storage market. HDD / SSD / NAS / USB Flash OCZ. OCZ SSD Utility 996 downloads.
These are the primary new features since SSD Guru/AccessPro.OCZ is quoting sequential read speeds up to 2,600MB/s, sequential write performance up to 1,600MB/s, and up to 210,000 IOPS of random read performance. This is a major release of SSD Utility, which replaces the SSD Guru and SSD AccessPro products. Samsung Data Migration 4.0.0.13 60.4 MB. Samsung 840 EVO Performance Restoration Tool 1.1 4.98 MB Freeware 1087VistaXP 26378 5 Samsung 840 EVO Performance Restoration Tool checks Samsung 840 drives for a known performance issue and updates the firmware if needed. Casting a wider net, the RD400 also includes an M.2 PCIe adapter for those desktop PCs that do not have an M.2 slot.OCZ SSD Utility is designed to manage your OCZ SSDs with a graphical interface. The Toshiba OCZ RD400 is OCZ’s first NVMe SSD targeting the consumer demographic, specifically enthusiasts and gamers.
Performance Optimization: TRIM, Idle Time Garbage Collection Product Health Monitoring: Self-Monitoring, Analysis and Reporting Technology (SMART) Support Capacities: 128GB, 256GB, 512GB, 1,024GB We will be looking at the 512GB unit in this review. This hassle-free program, which comes with all OCZ SSDs, ships a replacement drive with no return shipping costs to consumers with defective products.Backed by a 5-year warranty, the Toshiba OCZ RD400 M.2 comes in capacities of 128GB, 256GB, 512GB, and 1TB.
The Samsung 950 Pro showed top average latency readings with 0.0219ms, while the SM951 NVMe showed the best results in max latency with just 0.58ms.In our next 4K test, we looked at a workload with 100% write activity, which scales from 1QD to 64QD. In the aligned write scenario, the RD400 picked up its performance with 41,956 IOPS at 1QD with a whopping 132,672 IOPS at 64QD. Here, the drive recorded 28MB/s read and 164MB/s write.Looking at throughput told a similar story, with the RD400 recording 7,241 IOPS read and 42,122 IOPS write. The Samsung SSD 950 Pro m.2 NVMe 512GB was the top performing drive here with 13,516 IOPS read and 44,903 IOPS write.When looking at 4K write latency (both the average and maximum readings) the RD400 kept up with the rest of the NVMe drives in average read latency with 0.0233ms. However, it posted 31.01ms in maximum latency. The next best drive was the Samsung SSD SM951 m.2 NVMe 256GB, which posted 1,417MB/s read and 1,076MB/s write.When switching to smaller 4K random transfers, the RD400 slowed down significantly.
The RD400 posted a range of 7,286 IOPS to 81,575 IOPS.Our last profile looks at workstation activity, which is comprised of a 20% write and 80% read mixture using 8K transfers. The SM951 NVMe 256GB took top honors once again.The next profile looks at a file server, with 80% read and 20% write workload spread out over multiple transfer sizes ranging from 512-byte to 64KB. Here, the RD400 posted results well below the rest of the NVMe drives with 5,813 IOPS at 1QD and 56,557 IOPS at 128QD. This was just behind the SM951 256GB’s 108,711 IOPS at 64QD.Our web server profile is read-only with a spread of transfer sizes from 512-byte to 512KB. Each of our server profile tests has a strong preference towards read activity, ranging from 67% read with our database profile to 100% read in our web server profile.The first is our database profile, which uses a 67% read and 33% write workload mix primarily centered on 8K transfer sizes, which shows the RD400 with 7,816 IOPS at 1QD and 107,006 IOPS at 64QD. The difference between the two top M.2 SSDs was less than 1,000 IOPS (Samsung SSD SM951 M.2 NVMe 256GB and Samsung SSD 950 Pro M.2 NVMe 512GB).Our last series of synthetic benchmarks compare the hard drives in a series of server mixed-workloads with a queue depth ranging from 1 to 128.
Ocz Ssd Utility 2.0.2430 Movie In Media
Higher IOPS and MB/s rates with lower latency times are preferred. In this test we include: playing one 720P HD movie in Media Player Classic, one 480P SD movie playing in VLC, three movies downloading simultaneously through iTunes, and one 1080i HDTV stream being recorded through Windows Media Center over a 15 minute period. For this reason we turned to our StorageMark 2010 traces, which include HTPC and Gaming traces to help readers find out how a drive might rank under these conditions.The first real-life test is our HTPC scenario. It helps when comparing drives in every setting possible, but it doesn’t exactly work out into faster everyday usage or better game loading times.
To give a simple breakdown of read/write percentages, the HTPC test is 64% write and 36% read, the Productivity test is 59% write and 41% read, while the gaming trace is 6% write and 94% read. Unlike the HTPC or Productivity trace, this one relies heavily on the read performance of a drive. In this trace we recorded 4,830MB being written to the drive and 2,758MB being read.In our Productivity trace, there was an even larger discrepancy between the RD400 and the other NVMe drives, as it posted 20,123 IOPS, 618MB/s, and 0.39ms in average latency.Our last real-life test covers disk activity in a gaming environment. This test includes: a three hour period operating in an office productivity environment with 32-bit Vista running Outlook 2007 connected to an Exchange server, web browsing using Chrome and IE8, editing files within Office 2007, viewing PDFs in Adobe Reader, and an hour of local music playback with two hours of additional online music via Pandora. For all intents and purposes, this test shows drive performance under normal daily activity for most users.
This placed it at the top of the leaderboard, which is unsurprising since OCZ touted one of its use cases as a gaming drive. In this trace we recorded 426MB being written to the drive and 7,235MB being read.In our read-intensive Gaming trace, the RD400 picked up its pace significantly, posting 1,463MB/s, 30,129 IOPS, and a leading average latency of 0.221ms. The trace captures the heavy read activity of each game loading from the start, as well as textures as the game progresses.
0 kommentar(er)
